SPS Seminar series: Jonathan Rodden (Stanford University): "Policy Lotteries and Polarization"
Abstract: In the literature on polarization, it is axiomatic that hostility and negative
affect between groups are heightened by within-group homogeneity and clarity of
purpose. However, this paper argues the opposite for political parties in democ-
racies: when voters are risk-averse, negative affect toward out-parties should
increase with their internal heterogeneity or ambiguity. We use data from a
number of surveys to demonstrate that both within countries and across coun-
tries, voters express more negative affect toward parties whose policies are most
unpredictable. Affective polarization is associated not with homogeneous par-
ties that credibly commit to rigid, fixed platforms, but rather, by heterogeneous
parties whose policies are viewed by voters as dangerous policy lotteries.